‹ E-CIPM 23-523: THOMAS SON OF THOMAS DE LA POLE, CHEVALIER ›

Holdings

The following came to the hands of ‪ Henry V and is in the hands of ‪ Henry VI owing to the death of Thomas de la Pole, knight , and the minority of Thomas de la Pole , son and heir of Thomas de la Pole . Thomas de la Pole , father, held the manor in demesne as of fee tail male by a fine levied at Westminster on the octave of Trinity 1384 [CP 25/1/289/54 no. 113], between William de la Pole son of Michael de la Pole, knight , quer., and Michael de la Pole, knight , deforc. Michael de la Pole granted that the manor, held by Richard de la Pole for life with reversion to Michael and his heirs, should remain to William and the heirs male of his body, to hold of the king and his heirs by due service in perpetuity. If William should die without heir male of his body, with Richard still living, then Richard should hold the manor to him and the heirs male of his body, and if William should die without heir male of his body, with "Richard already deceased, the manor should remain to the heirs male of the body of Richard. [1]+If William and Richard each die without heir male of his body, the manor should remain to Thomas de la Pole son of Michael, and to the heirs male of his body, with reversion to Michael and his heirs.+[1]

Holdings

The following came to the hands of ‪ Henry V and is in the hands of ‪ Henry VI for the same reasons as 521. Thomas de la Pole , father, held the manor in demesne as of fee tail male by a fine levied at Westminster on the octave of Trinity 1384 [CP 25/1/289/54 no. 112], beween Thomas, father, described as Thomas de la Pole, knight , son of Michael de la Pole, knight , quer., and Michael de la Pole, knight , deforc. Michael granted, for him and his heirs, that the manor of Norton, held by John de la Pole for life with reversion to Michael and his heirs, should remain to Thomas, father, and the heirs male of his body, to hold of the king and his heirs by due service. [3]+Failing such heirs, the manor should successively remain to William de la Pole son of Michael, and the heirs male of his body; and to Richard de la Pole son of Michael, and the heirs male of his body, with reversion to Michael and his heirs.+[3] John afterwards died.

Holdings

The following came to the hands of ‪ Henry V and is in the hands of ‪ Henry VI for the same reasons as 521. Thomas de la Pole , father, held the manor in demesne as of fee tail male by a fine levied on the octave of Trinity 1384 [CP 25/1/289/54 no. 112]. Michael de la Pole, knight , granted that Thomas de la Pole , father, described as Thomas de la Pole, knight , son of Michael de la Pole, knight , who held the manor *for life* [see 524] by grant of Michael, should hold it to him and the heirs male of his body of the king and his heirs by due service in perpetuity. Continues as 522+[3].

Holdings

The following came to the hands of ‪ Henry V and is in the hands of ‪ Henry VI for the same reasons as 521. Continues as 523 with two exceptions. Omit *for life*, and change the date of death of Thomas son of Thomas to 27 July last.

Holdings

Nothing came to the hands of ‪ Henry V nor is in the hands of ‪ Henry VI for the reasons as 521. Thomas de la Pole , father, was formerly seised of the manor of Grafton Regis in demesne as of fee tail male by a fine levied on the octave of Trinity 1384 [CP 25/1/289/54 no. 113]. Michael de la Pole, knight , granted that William de la Pole son of Michael de la Pole who held the manor for life by grant of Michael, should hold the manor to him and the heirs male of his body of the king and his heirs by due service in perpetuity. If William should die without heir male of his body, the manor should remain to Richard de la Pole son of the said Michael, and to the heirs male of his body. Continues as 521+[1]. William and Richard died, each without heir male of his body. Thomas de la Pole , father, survived and had issue: Thomas de la Pole . Thomas de la Pole , father, granted the manor to Robert Hawerby , now deceased, and Richard Gratele , still living, and to their heirs and assigns in perpetuity. The grant was made by charter dated Grafton Regis 1 September 1417. Robert and Richard were seised in demesne as of fee and continued to be so seised during the life of Thomas. Robert died. Richard then demised the manor to the lady Anne de la Pole , lately wife of Thomas de la Pole , father, and still living, and to the heirs male of the bodies of Anne and Thomas together. The grant was made by charter dated Grafton Regis, Monday 30 September 1420. She is thus seised of the manor and has taken its issues since that Monday. Letters patent, pardoning the above alienations of the manor, were obtained, dated Westminster 4 December 1420 [CPR 1416–1422, p. 314]. The charters and letters patent were shown in evidence on the taking of the inquisition.